Innovative integration between incubated startups and universities to achieve continuous competitive advantages in dynamic enviroments

Authors

  • Rogerio Tadeu de Oliveira Lacerda UFSC
  • Brianna Luiza Klein UFSC
  • Julia Figueiredo Fulco UFSC
  • Gabriel Santos ACATE - SC
  • Kamilla Bittarello MIDI TECNOLOGICO

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22279/navus.2017.v7n2.p78-96.497

Keywords:

Innovation. Constructivism. Business incubation. Decision. Education.

Abstract

This article intents to show an approach of integration between startups and the university through the generation and diffusion of scientific and applied knowledge. The goals of this paper are to: (i) disseminate innovative management practices in companies that belong to business incubators; (ii) narrow the relation between theory and practice in business management education, especially in dynamic environments; (iii) create a favorable environment for students of the Business school to develop the necessary skills of management through the active learning, while entrepreneurs of incubated startups can think over their management processes. This purpose is achieved through a constructivist approach to active learning with the dynamic participation of undergraduate students of the Business course, under the supervision of a professor-facilitator and the engagement of managers of business start-ups. The article presents the results of exploratory cases that aimed to understand management problems of incubated startups in the Technological MIDI incubator.  Then the article proposes a decision model to assist entrepreneurs, and relying on their values and preferences. The research introduces innovation in the management view as it presents the use of the Lean Startup approach supporting a constructivist decision making model to evaluate and plan alternative actions. In addition, it also presents an innovative integration approach between incubated companies and universities, in which the startup can acquire the knowledge of business strategies present in the business school to improve their performance and students can take advantage of active and practical learning gaining knowledge applicable in their academic and professional life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Rogerio Tadeu de Oliveira Lacerda, UFSC

Rogerio Lacerda é professor efetivo do Departamento de Ciências da Administração da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Lacerda é doutor em Engenharia da Produção (2012) pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, possui o título de mestre em Engenharia da Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (2009), graduação em Administração de Empresas pela Universidade Metropolitana de Santos (1997) e pós graduação em Engenharia da Informação pela FASP (1999). Seu interesse de pesquisa atual é a utilização da metodologia MCDA-C (Metodologia Multi-Criterio de Apoio a Decisão - Construtivista) como instrumento de apoio à decisão, gestão estratégica das organizações e gestão da inovação. Também pesquisa sobre os temas de gerenciamento de projetos, portfólio, processos de negócios, gestão de operações e organizações de base tecnológica. Lacerda é especializado em Gestão Estratégica, Gerenciamento de Projetos, Gerenciamento de Processos (BPM) e Arquitetura de Sistemas de Informação. Tem experiência em institucionalização de Escritórios de Projetos (PMO) e experiência com projetos de desenvolvimento de produtos e tecnologia. Tem experiência em melhoria de processos organizacionais e do uso de Tecnologia e Inovação como vantagem competitiva para organizações de diversos portes. Gerenciou programas de melhorias de processos e tem experiência com modelos de maturidade, como CMMI, OPM3, ITIL, ISO e BPMM. Tem experiência na área de Administração, com ênfase em Gerenciamento de Projetos e é profissional certificado PMP pelo PMI. Participou do projeto OPM3 - Project Management Institute.

Brianna Luiza Klein, UFSC

Estudante Administração - UFSC – CSE (Centro Sócio Econômico), UFSC (Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina),

References

ACHANGA, Pius et al. Critical success factors for lean implementation within SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 17, n. 4, p. 460-471, 2006.

BANA E COSTA, C. A. Processo de Apoio à decisão: Problemáticas, Actores e Acções. ENE/UFSC. Florianópolis, 1995.

COOPER, Robert G. Perspective: The stage‐gate® idea‐to‐launch process—update, what's new, and nexgen systems. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 25, n. 3, p. 213-232, 2008.

DINGSØYR, T. et al. A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development. Journal of Systems and Software, v. 85, n. 6, p. 1213-1221, 2012.

EDEN, Colin; ACKERMANN, Fran; CROPPER, Steve. The analysis of cause maps. Journal of management Studies, v. 29, n. 3, p. 309-324, 1992.

EDMONSTONE, John. The Action Learner's Toolkit. London:Gower Publishing Company Limited, 2003.

ENSSLIN, L.; MONTIBELLER NETO, G.; NORONHA, S. M. D. Apoio à decisão: metodologias para estruturação de problemas e avaliação multicritério de alternativas. Florianopolis: Insular, 2001.

GIL, Antonio Carlos. Como elaborar trabalhos de pesquisa. São Paulo: Atlas, 1991.

HALLGREN, Mattias; OLHAGER, Jan. Lean and agile manufacturing: external and internal drivers and performance outcomes. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 29, n. 10, p. 976-999, 2009.

HASIN, Sanjay; BURCHER, Peter. Lean viewed as a philosophy. Journal of manufacturing technology management, v. 17, n. 1, p. 56-72, 2006.

HUDSON, M.; SMART, A.; BOURNE, M. Theory and practice in SME performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 21, n. 8, p. 1096-1115. 2001.

LACERDA, RTO; ENSSLIN, Leonardo; ROLIM ENSSLIN, Sandra. A performance measurement framework in portfolio management: A constructivist case. Management Decision, v. 49, n. 4, p. 648-668, 2011.

LORD, Thomas R. A comparison between traditional and constructivist teaching in college biology. Innovative Higher Education, v. 21, n. 3, p. 197-216, 1997.

MCCARTHY, J. Patrick; ANDERSON, Liam. Active learning techniques versus traditional teaching styles: two experiments from history and political science. Innovative Higher Education, v. 24, n. 4, p. 279-294, 2000.

MACVAUGH, Jason; NORTON, Mike. Introducing sustainability into business education contexts using active learning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, v. 13, n. 1, p. 72-87, 2012.

MAURYA, Ash. Running lean: iterate from plan A to a plan that works. Sebastopol: O'Reilly, 2012.

MARQUARDT, M. J. O poder da aprendizagem pela ação: como solucionar problemas e desenvolver líderes em tempo real. Rio de Janeiro: Senac Rio, 2005.

PEDLER, Mike. Action learning in practice. Burlington:Gower Publishing, Ltd., 2011.

PETTERSEN, Jostein. Defining lean production: some conceptual and practical issues. The TQM Journal, v. 21, n. 2, p. 127-142, 2009.

POWNER, Leanne C.; ALLENDOERFER, Michelle G. Evaluating hypotheses about active learning. International Studies Perspectives, v. 9, n. 1, p. 75-89, 2008.

QUMER, Asif; HENDERSON-SELLERS, Brian. An evaluation of the degree of agility in six agile methods and its applicability for method engineering. Information and software technology, v. 50, n. 4, p. 280-295, 2008.

RIES, Eric. The lean startup: How today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York:Crown Books, 2011.

ROY, B. Decision science or decision-aid science? European Journal of Operational Research, v. 66, n. 2, p. 184-203, 1993.

TRKMAN, Peter. The critical success factors of business process management. International journal of information management, v. 30, n. 2, p. 125-134, 2010.

TRIVIÑOS, Augusto Nibaldo Silva. Introdução à pesquisa em ciências sociais: a pesquisa qualitativa em educação. O positivismo; a fenomenologia; o marxismo. São Paulo: Atlas, 1987.

YIN, Robert K. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications, 2013.

WYNN-WILLIAMS, Kate; WHITING, Rosalind H.; ADLER, Ralph W. The influence of business case studies on learning styles: An empirical investigation. Accounting Education: an international journal, v. 17, n. 2, p. 113-128, 2008.

Published

2017-04-10

Issue

Section

Articles